Essay examples --

bloody shame Anne Warren and others argue for a liberal position on the abortion debate. A liberal view of abortion is roughly thought of as an root word that abortions should be able to be terminated at any stage in the pregnancy. In this paper, I allow argue a defense of abortion, or a liberal view of abortion, using utilitarianism. I will then move to a counter occupation about the moral worth of the fetus. I will reply to this objection by looking at a strong argument by Marquis. Finally, Ill conclude that Warrens is the stronger position. This argument will take note a utilitarian view of the availability of abortion.To examine the ethics of abortion, it is important to freshman examine utilitarianism. Utilitarianism generally follows the idea that it is important to do whatever the superlative good for the greatest amount of mess is. In Michael Sandels book Justice, he gives a definition of utilitarianism as the highest moral principle will be to maximize utility for th e most people (Sandel, 34). In this essay I will demonstrate how bloody shame Anne Warren uses this idea to build a fast foundation for her argument in favor of unfettered use of abortions.Similar to Mary Anne Warren, I believe that abortions should always remain legal because there is no stage in fetal development in which a fetus checks a person. Warren does make the distinction that a fetus may jibe a human being because they have a full genetic cypher and emf of become a person, however, Warren defines a person as someone with the capacity for rational thought, therefore a fetus might resemble a human but doesnt resemble a person. (Warren, 11). spot it is hotly contested, a fetus doesnt have rational thought. For the most part, people would not consider a fet... ...oes present an extremely strong argument against abortion, it is not stronger than Mary Anne Warrens position for the reason that potential beings do not hold rights and thus have no right to a future while developed beings do hold rights and thus should have an coercive right to an abortion. All in all, while there are galore(postnominal) views and assessments on the ethics and morality of abortion, the utilitarianism view is clearly the best because it maximizes the utility of actual persons, and because fetuses arent persons, they dont have to be considered in our utility calculus and can justifiably be aborted at any stage in gestation. Although the conservative view curtail abortions is very strong, it deprives actual persons of their utility in favor of the utility of potential beings and therefore in no way, shape, or form follows the general ideas of utilitarianism. Essay examples -- Mary Anne Warren and others argue for a liberal position on the abortion debate. A liberal view of abortion is roughly thought of as an idea that abortions should be able to be terminated at any stage in the pregnancy. In this paper, I will argue a defense of abortion, or a liber al view of abortion, using utilitarianism. I will then respond to a counterargument about the moral worth of the fetus. I will respond to this objection by looking at a strong argument by Marquis. Finally, Ill conclude that Warrens is the stronger position. This argument will follow a utilitarian view of the availability of abortion.To examine the ethics of abortion, it is important to first examine utilitarianism. Utilitarianism generally follows the idea that it is important to do whatever the greatest good for the greatest amount of people is. In Michael Sandels book Justice, he gives a definition of utilitarianism as the highest moral principle will be to maximize utility for the most people (Sandel, 34). In this essay I will demonstrate how Mary Anne Warren uses this idea to build a solid foundation for her argument in favor of unfettered use of abortions.Similar to Mary Anne Warren, I believe that abortions should always remain legal because there is no stage in fetal develo pment in which a fetus resembles a person. Warren does make the distinction that a fetus may resemble a human being because they have a full genetic code and potential of become a person, however, Warren defines a person as someone with the capacity for rational thought, therefore a fetus might resemble a human but doesnt resemble a person. (Warren, 11). While it is hotly contested, a fetus doesnt have rational thought. For the most part, people would not consider a fet... ...oes present an extremely strong argument against abortion, it is not stronger than Mary Anne Warrens position for the reason that potential beings do not hold rights and thus have no right to a future while actual beings do hold rights and thus should have an absolute right to an abortion. All in all, while there are many views and assessments on the ethics and morality of abortion, the utilitarianism view is clearly the best because it maximizes the utility of actual persons, and because fetuses arent persons , they dont have to be considered in our utility calculus and can justifiably be aborted at any stage in gestation. Although the conservative view restricting abortions is very strong, it deprives actual persons of their utility in favor of the utility of potential beings and therefore in no way, shape, or form follows the general ideas of utilitarianism.